New York magazine features a piece by Sokol, on Craig Robbins and his ‘Art + Research’ an University of Miami parterned venture.
This area will also be home to his new program, headily named Art + Research. If all goes according to plan, it’ll open in September 2009 with eight-to-twelve “resident artists”—who will receive full scholarships, studio space, housing, and stipends. They hope to expand it later. The University of Miami–operated venture already has an impressive roster of New Yorkers onboard. Founding faculty include artists Liam Gillick and Rirkrit Tiravanija, both of whom teach in Columbia’s M.F.A. program; Yale instructor Steven Henry Madoff; and White Columns gallery director Matthew Higgs (they will all squeeze Miami tutorials into their current gigs). Former Columbia art-school dean Bruce Ferguson consulted on it. And for added star power, sitting on the board of Robins’s nonprofit Anaphiel organization to guide the school are former Whitney director (and Robins’s cousin) David Ross, John Baldessari, and ex–Art Basel director Sam Keller. Robins will kick in $2 million to help fund Art + Research for its first four years, and the University of Miami has promised to help raise another $2 million.
Unlike at Columbia and Yale, there won’t be any formal M.F.A. degrees awarded to those who complete the two-year program, which will revolve around a topical theme that changes with each entering biannual class. Accordingly, don’t expect to see the “resident artists” hunker down in front of easels and live models. “Most art is conceptually based now. It’s art based on an idea,” says Madoff. “It didn’t turn out that the twentieth century’s most influential artist was Picasso. It turned out it was Duchamp … We don’t need to do foundation courses, how to draw, how to sculpt … You don’t need three credits for American Art History From 1945 to the Present.”
I wonder if and how this project will benefit any Miami artists.
The article has a little sidebar of story on the second page. I find it amusing.
[…] dig placed an interesting blog post on Brett Sokol’s "Miami Art Machine"Here’s a brief overview […]
the last sentence on the backstory column invites the question: and this is a good thing why?
[…] dig placed an observative post today on Brett Sokolâ??s â??Miami Art Machineâ??Here’s a quick excerpt […]
This sentence particularly irked me:
“But the art boom, and the arrival of an international crowd more interested in Cuba as a vacation spot, has changed that.”
Not that I don’t get as sick of exile politics as anyone else (and I’m Cuban-American), but it kind of sounds like, “Thank god that whole Cuba thing is back to being a quaint tourist relic again!” For an “international audience” who is only here (en masse, at least) for four days a year. yeesh.