AG2023_1120451a or d’où jaillira l’éclair de sa mort


Nous n’écrivions ni pour le romantisme de la vie d’écrivain – il s’est caricaturé –, ni pour l’argent – ce serait suicidaire –, ni pour la gloire – valeur démodée, à laquelle l’époque préfère la célébrité –, ni pour le futur – il n’avait rien demandé –, ni pour transformer le monde – ce n’est pas le monde qu’il faut transformer –, ni pour changer la vie – elle ne change jamais –, pas pour l’engagement – laissons ça aux écrivains héroïques –, non plus que nous ne célébrions l’art gratuit – qui est une illusion puisque l’art se paie toujours. Alors pour quelle raison ? On ne savait pas ; et là était peut-être notre réponse : nous écrivions parce que nous ne savions rien, nous écrivions pour dire que nous ne savions plus ce qu’il fallait faire au monde, sinon écrire, sans espoir mais sans résignation facile, avec obstination et épuisement et joie, dans le seul but de finir le mieux possible, c’est-à-dire les yeux ouverts : tout voir, ne rien rater, ne pas ciller, ne pas s’abriter sous les paupières, courir le risque d’avoir les yeux crevés à force de tout vouloir voir, pas comme voit un témoin ou un prophète, non, mais comme désire voir une sentinelle, la sentinelle seule et tremblante d’une cité misérable et perdue, qui scrute pourtant l’ombre d’où jaillira l’éclair de sa mort et la fin de sa cité.

Mohamed Mbougar Sarr


Whispering through a Stone.

AG2025_1156335a as an evident condition of

AG2025_1156335a

In terms of the development of “democracy,” it is difficult to overestimate the enormous gain Western governments managed to consolidate when they successfully advanced democracy as the opposing counterweight to communism. They had actually gained control of the entire word for themselves, leaving nary a trace of its former emancipatory resonance. Indeed, democracy had become a class ideology justifying systems that allowed a very small number of people to govern—and to govern without the people, so to speak; systems that seem to exclude any other possibility than the infinite reproduction of their own functioning. To be able to call an unchecked and deregulated free market economy, a ruthless, no-holds-barred opposition to communism, a right to intervene, militarily and otherwise, in countless sovereign nations and their internal affairs—to succeed in calling all this democracy was an incredible feat. To successfully present the market as an evident condition of democracy and to have democracy viewed as inexorably calling forth the market, is an astounding accomplishment. (Kristin Ross)

It is about a play of variations and even monstrosities. McKenzie Wark on Asger Jorn

Jorn thought the aesthetic task was to reignite sensation through experiments in emergent form. His was an aesthetics of accidents, experiments, elaborations rather than purification. He opposed any return to Hellenic idealism and insisted that art needed to keep abreast of the latest developments in the natural sciences. He thought that the evolution of form in any domain took place through dissymmetry. Jorn: “ugliness is no less rare than beauty.”

Jorn was opposed to that strand of modernism that sought only a purification of form and which tended to fetishize the geometric. Nature isn’t a matter of pure forms for Jorn. It is about a play of variations and even monstrosities. Jornian aesthetics does not seek a balance between the disinterested appreciation of Apollonian rigor and the immersive passions of Dionysian play. For Jorn, the tension between the figures of Apollo and Dionysus is actually a class struggle between aristocratic and folk life. Rather than the war on monsters that constitute the mythic life of every ruling class, Jorn is on the side of the monsters. Or as Michele Bernstein says apropos Jorn, “monsters of all lands unite!”

[…]

Art is experimental social practice. Ruling class art is Apollonian and represents the world as made in its own image. What it fears is the alignment of popular power with the forces of nature in an open-ended process, as the capacity to reinvent form, including social and political forms. Art is playful; play is social. To modify Lautréamont: “poetry should be played by all.”

[…]

Jorn saw a way forward in the practices of the Letterist International, perhaps one of the most marginal and inconsequential avant-gardes of the time – at least from the art world’s point of view. A shorthand way of explaining what he saw in them might be to think about the name of the movement they would found together: the Situationist International. It was Sartre who had put the category of situation back into play. In Sartre, the situation was where a free consciousness came up against the inertia of a facticity it could not know about in advance. But in Sartre the situation is given, a stage for an individual encounter. For the situationists, the collaborative and playful labor of the production of situations might yield a renewed consciousness, unknown ambiences and affect, a playful reconstruction of the world.

Thus, the Letterist practices of dérive, potlatch and détournement might point the way forward, to a reinvention of art as collaborative, experimental practice, meant to make new myths, new avatars, a whole way of life. Of course, all of this will be absorbed back into the art world as an archive. As images and concepts to be processed into the making of more of the same. But Jorn wanted more than that. Now that we know that this is the Anthropocene, that things can’t just go on as they are, perhaps we need more than art-world Asger Jorn. We need Jorn the thinker and activist of the materialist attitude to life. Or so I argued in The Beach Beneath the Street.

Asger Jorn: Monsters of all lands unite!, McKenzie Wark, September 11, 2016.


Asger Jorn, Conte du Nord (Northern Count) (Modification), 1959. Oil on canvas on found painting. 31.7 x 21.1 inches. via Strategic Vandalism: The Legacy of Asger Jorn’s Modification Paintings, curated by Axel Heil and Roberto Ohrt, Petzel, March 5 – April 13, 2019.


Valentin Guerrier.

Scrub

Thought to be the oldest habitat in Florida, scrub habitat formed 10,000 to 100,000 years ago when sea levels were higher. As the seas rose and retreated, sandy island ridges formed from coastal dunes, creating patches of isolated land. Over thousands of years, plants and animals adapted to the dry sandy ridges and evolved in isolation.

Because the plants and animals adapted to the unique conditions of these ridges, over half the species found in scrub are endemic to this habitat, meaning they are found no where else in the world. Most scrub is found in Central Florida, although the habitat does extend south into northern Miami-Dade County.

Scrub is a critically endangered habitat, threatened by citrus farms, cattle grazing, urban development and invasion of exotic species.

Wildlife

A scrub landscape has open sandy areas scattered with tall pines, short oak and palmetto trees, and small herbaceous plants. Like the habitat, many plants and animals found in scrub are threatened or endangered.

Endangered gopher tortoises burrow dens up to 30 feet long in the open white sand, emerging to eat saw palmetto berries and the endangered paw paw’s yellow fruit. Burrowing owls and other animals also use the tortoise holes for shelter. Small threatened scrub lizards sun on rosemary bushes, waiting for insects and spiders.

The blue gray Florida scrub jay, a threatened species found only in Florida, flutters from scrub palmetto to cabbage palm looking for spiders, young frogs, and snakes to eat

Scrub in Miami-Dade County

In Miami-Dade County, scrub is found at the southern end of its range, in the form of scrubby flatwoods. Two transitional areas of scrubby flatwoods still exist in northern Miami-Dade County: “County Line Scrub” and the “Dolphin Center Addition.”

Both sites have been acquired for conservation by Miami-Dade County’s Environmentally Endangered Lands (EEL) Program. These two isolated sites represent the last remaining remnants in Miami-Dade County of this old and formerly extensive ecosystem.


Dolphin Center Addition. County Line Scrub.

This group of properties represents the only publicly preserved scrub sites in
Miami-Dade County. Dolphin Center is owned by the Parks
Department, while County Line and Dolphin Center Addition
were purchased by the Environmentally Endangered Lands
Program. These preserves have some unusual plants of dry sand
environments, including Myrtle oak, Chapman’s oak, scrub
palmetto, staggerbush, paw paw, blueberry, and Florida
elephant’s foot. via Tillandsia_2014_05

Environmentally Endangered Land Site.


A garden is an ideal place

A garden, said the British horticulturist Gertrude Jekyll (1843-1932), who designed one of the gardens in our top 25, “teaches entire trust.”

25 Gardens. NYTimes

The 25 Gardens You Must See

We asked six horticultural experts to debate and ultimately choose the places that’ve changed the way we look at — and think about — plants.
1. Sissinghurst Castle Garden in Cranbrook, England
2. Great Dixter House & Gardens in Northiam, England
3. Giardino di Ninfa in Cisterna di Latina, Italy
7. Royal Botanic Garden Sydney in Sydney, Australia
8. The High Line in New York City
21. Villa d’Este in Tivoli, Italy
23. Château de Vaux-le-Vicomte in Maincy, France
25. Edward James Sculpture Garden, Las Pozas, in Xilitla, Mexico